linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] acpi, pci, irq: account for early penalty assignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56C5F4B4.2080400@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:43:32 -0500
From:	Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
	Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, ravikanth.nalla@....com,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, harish.k@....com,
	ashwin.reghunandanan@....com,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] acpi, pci, irq: account for early penalty assignment

On 2/18/2016 11:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> +#define ACPI_PCI_LINK_MAX_EARLY_IRQINFO 1024
> Why do we need so many of them?
> 

The previous code supported 1024 max interrupts before 
"ACPI, PCI, irq: remove interrupt count restriction" change. 

I added back 1024 number but the limit is only for early IRQs now.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project