lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:43:32 -0500 From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>, Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>, Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, ravikanth.nalla@....com, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, harish.k@....com, ashwin.reghunandanan@....com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] acpi, pci, irq: account for early penalty assignment On 2/18/2016 11:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> +#define ACPI_PCI_LINK_MAX_EARLY_IRQINFO 1024 > Why do we need so many of them? > The previous code supported 1024 max interrupts before "ACPI, PCI, irq: remove interrupt count restriction" change. I added back 1024 number but the limit is only for early IRQs now. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists