[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160218175447.GD2538@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:54:47 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, mingo@...nel.org,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kasan: clear stale stack poison
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 05:27:38PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> @@ -145,6 +146,7 @@ ENTRY(cpu_resume_mmu)
> ENDPROC(cpu_resume_mmu)
> .popsection
> cpu_resume_after_mmu:
> + kasan_unpoison_stack 96
I don't think the 96 here is needed since we populate the stack in
assembly (__cpu_suspend_enter) and unwind it again still in assembly
(cpu_resume_after_mmu), so no KASAN shadow writes/reads.
Otherwise the patch looks fine.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists