[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzJ0YR5Q4AyrM2T+yB+BgnTvkVoBuKSbSa5UGdc86BfiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:12:42 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>
> If we faulted during the copy, then 'trapnr' will say which type
> of trap (X86_TRAP_PF or X86_TRAP_MC) and 'remain' says how many
> bytes were not copied.
So apart from the naming, a couple of questions:
- I'd like to see the actual *use* case explained, not just what it does.
- why does this use the complex - and slower, on modern machines -
unrolled manual memory copy, when you might as well just use a single
rep ; movsb
which not only makes it smaller, but makes the exception fixup trivial.
- why not make the "bytes remaining" the same as for a user-space
copy (ie return it as the return value)?
- at that point, it ends up looking a *lot* like uaccess_try/catch,
which gets the error code from current_thread_info()->uaccess_err
Hmm?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists