[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1455819551-4666-4-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:19:11 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] thermal: exynos: Defer probe if vtmu is present but not registered
The driver doesn't check if the regulator_get_optional return value is
-EPROBE_DEFER so it will wrongly assume that the regulator couldn't be
found just because the regulator driver wasn't registered yet, i.e:
exynos-tmu 10060000.tmu: Regulator node (vtmu) not found
In this case the return value should be propagated to allow the driver
probe function to be deferred until the regulator driver is registered.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
---
drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index f4f36bba7be9..f3ce94ec73b5 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -1318,6 +1318,8 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
} else {
+ if (PTR_ERR(data->regulator) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator node (vtmu) not found\n");
}
--
2.5.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists