[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20160218014610.GJ10719@samsunx.samsung>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:46:10 +0900
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: s2mps11: Simplify expression used in
BUILD_BUG_ON
> >> Following BUILD_BUG_ON using a variable fails for some of the compilers
> >> and optimization levels (reported for gcc 4.9):
> >> var = ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps15_regulators);
> >> BUILD_BUG_ON(S2MPS_REGULATOR_MAX < var);
> >> Fix this by using ARRAY_SIZE directly.
> >>
> >> Additionally add missing BUILD_BUG_ON check for S2MPS15 device (the
> >> check ensures that internal arrays are big enough to hold data for all
> >> of regulators on all devices).
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> >>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> case S2MPS11X:
> >> s2mps11->rdev_num = ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps11_regulators);
> >
> > Why don't we remove rdev_num at all? It's not used that much
> > other than in the probe function.
>
> Remove from probe? It is used in probe and removal would make the code
> more complicated than it should be.
no, I mean remove it from s2mps11_info. Other than in the probe
this value is used only once in s2mps11_pmic_dt_parse() (which is
called by probe()).
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists