[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56C62375.3070607@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:03:01 -0800
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: samsung: fix the inconsistency in spinlock
On 02/18/2016 11:14 AM, Anand Moon wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out.
> Their is no lock up, just the inconstancy of the spin_lock.
> Then I will resend this patch dropping the spin_unlock/spin_lock
> around uart_write_wakeup.
> Is that ok with you.
Yes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists