linux-kernel - Applied "regulator: s2mps11: Simplify expression used in BUILD_BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1aWUw0-0003gU-2n@debutante>
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:12:20 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: s2mps11: Simplify expression used in BUILD_BUG_ON" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: s2mps11: Simplify expression used in BUILD_BUG_ON

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 297eaaa6d0bf09a91045e1d8c9b1e555d8b91d8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:35:07 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: s2mps11: Simplify expression used in BUILD_BUG_ON

Following BUILD_BUG_ON using a variable fails for some of the compilers
and optimization levels (reported for gcc 4.9):
	var = ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps15_regulators);
	BUILD_BUG_ON(S2MPS_REGULATOR_MAX < var);
Fix this by using ARRAY_SIZE directly.

Additionally add missing BUILD_BUG_ON check for S2MPS15 device (the
check ensures that internal arrays are big enough to hold data for all
of regulators on all devices).

Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Tested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
index 3242ffc0cb25..df553fb40d82 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
@@ -1090,26 +1090,27 @@ static int s2mps11_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	case S2MPS11X:
 		s2mps11->rdev_num = ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps11_regulators);
 		regulators = s2mps11_regulators;
-		BUILD_BUG_ON(S2MPS_REGULATOR_MAX < s2mps11->rdev_num);
+		BUILD_BUG_ON(S2MPS_REGULATOR_MAX < ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps11_regulators));
 		break;
 	case S2MPS13X:
 		s2mps11->rdev_num = ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps13_regulators);
 		regulators = s2mps13_regulators;
-		BUILD_BUG_ON(S2MPS_REGULATOR_MAX < s2mps11->rdev_num);
+		BUILD_BUG_ON(S2MPS_REGULATOR_MAX < ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps13_regulators));
 		break;
 	case S2MPS14X:
 		s2mps11->rdev_num = ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps14_regulators);
 		regulators = s2mps14_regulators;
-		BUILD_BUG_ON(S2MPS_REGULATOR_MAX < s2mps11->rdev_num);
+		BUILD_BUG_ON(S2MPS_REGULATOR_MAX < ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps14_regulators));
 		break;
 	case S2MPS15X:
 		s2mps11->rdev_num = ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps15_regulators);
 		regulators = s2mps15_regulators;
+		BUILD_BUG_ON(S2MPS_REGULATOR_MAX < ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps15_regulators));
 		break;
 	case S2MPU02:
 		s2mps11->rdev_num = ARRAY_SIZE(s2mpu02_regulators);
 		regulators = s2mpu02_regulators;
-		BUILD_BUG_ON(S2MPS_REGULATOR_MAX < s2mps11->rdev_num);
+		BUILD_BUG_ON(S2MPS_REGULATOR_MAX < ARRAY_SIZE(s2mpu02_regulators));
 		break;
 	default:
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid device type: %u\n",
-- 
2.7.0