[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160218201440.GA25570@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:14:40 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
* Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:12:42AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > If we faulted during the copy, then 'trapnr' will say which type
> > > of trap (X86_TRAP_PF or X86_TRAP_MC) and 'remain' says how many
> > > bytes were not copied.
> >
> > So apart from the naming, a couple of questions:
> >
> > - I'd like to see the actual *use* case explained, not just what it does.
>
> First user is libnvdimm. Dan Williams already has code to use this so that
> kernel code accessing persistent memory can return -EIO to a user instead of
> crashing the system if the cpu runs into an uncorrected error during the copy.
Are these the memcpy_*_pmem() calls in drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c? Is there any actual
patch to look at?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists