linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI/PM: Revert "PCI/PM: Drop unused runtime PM support code for PCIe ports"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2291941.JZkcHSQXDV@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 02:54:18 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, mika.westerberg@...el.com,
	Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...el.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI/PM: Revert "PCI/PM: Drop unused runtime PM support code for PCIe ports"

On Thursday, February 18, 2016 05:43:30 PM Qipeng Zha wrote:
> This reverts commit fe9a743a2601 ("PCI/PM: Drop unused runtime
> PM support code for PCIe ports"). To support PCIe ports
> runtime PM for Intel Broxton platform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@...el.com>

No, this isn't the right approach.

I've already said that for several times and I haven't changed my mind.

Mika is currently working on implementing this in a better way, please talk
to him.

Thanks,
Rafael