[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1758156.nKISImzkM9@phil>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:53:52 +0100
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, jwerner@...omium.org, broonie@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk,
huangtao@...k-chips.com, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Xing Zheng <zhengxing@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] dt-bindings: add documentation of rk3399 clock controller
Am Freitag, 19. Februar 2016, 08:48:15 schrieb Jianqun Xu:
> Hi Rob
>
> 在 18/02/2016 22:36, Rob Herring 写道:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:54:49AM +0800, jianqun.xu wrote:
> >> From: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@...k-chips.com>
> >>
> >> Add the devicetree binding for the cru on the rk3399 which quite
> >> similar structured as previous clock controllers.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@...k-chips.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> .../bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3399-cru.txt | 82
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3399-cru.txt>>
> >> diff --git
> >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3399-cru.txt
> >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3399-cru.txt new
> >> file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..07bcc6e
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3399-cru.txt
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
> >> +* Rockchip RK3399 Clock and Reset Unit
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> +Example: General Register Files
> >> +
> >> + pmugrf: syscon@...20000 {
> >> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-pmugrf", "syscon";
> >
> > Is this documented?
>
> Since there is no documentation for rockchip grf from early SoCs, I
> think if we need to add a new devicetree documentation, such as
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3399-grf.txt ?
The grf is not clock-specific, so the directory is probably not correct.
I'd think bindings/arm/rockchip/grf.txt might be better or
bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt or somewhere else. And define the properties
for all per-soc GRFs in there.
In any case we really should add the missing grf binding documentation (in a
separate patch of course), as the grf is a pretty commonly used shared
component.
>
> If you agree, I will add it in next patch
>
> >> + reg = <0x0 0xff320000 0x0 0x1000>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + grf: syscon@...70000 {
> >> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-grf", "syscon";
> >
> > ditto.
> >
> >> + reg = <0x0 0xff770000 0x0 0x10000>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> +Example: Clock controller node:
> >> +
> >> + pmucru: pmu-clock-controller@...50000 {
> >> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-pmucru";
> >> + reg = <0x0 0xff750000 0x0 0x1000>;
> >> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> >> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + cru: clock-controller@...60000 {
> >> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-cru";
> >> + reg = <0x0 0xff760000 0x0 0x1000>;
> >> + rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
> >> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> >> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> +Example: UART controller node that consumes the clock generated by the
> >> clock + controller:
> >> +
> >> + uart0: serial@...a0000 {
> >> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-uart", "snps,dw-apb-uart";
> >> + reg = <0x0 0xff180000 0x0 0x100>;
> >> + clocks = <&cru SCLK_UART0>, <&cru PCLK_UART0>;
> >> + clock-names = "baudclk", "apb_pclk";
> >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 99 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >> + reg-shift = <2>;
> >> + reg-io-width = <4>;
> >> + };
> >> --
> >> 1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists