[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1602190930310.2477@nanos>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:39:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 07/11] x86/perf/uncore: Track packages not per cpu data
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> So there is a limitation to BIOS creativity and all we need is to maintain a
> logical package id.
Just for the record. This driver would fall apart today if the socket ids
would be > 7. The uncore extra PCI devs assume a fixed mapping between the
physid in their config space and the physid of the socket. If the pci config
space id would be > 8 then the storage space is exceeded.
#define UNCORE_SOCKET_MAX 8
struct pci_dev *uncore_extra_pci_dev[UNCORE_SOCKET_MAX][UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV_MAX];
Of course there is no range check for this either. uncore_pci_probe() sticks
it blindly into the array....
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists