linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4528627.ddzfcWQ79X@wuerfel>
Date:	Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:17:53 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
Cc:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	Jon Medhurst <tixy@...aro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Maxime Coquelin stm32 <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32

On Friday 19 February 2016 08:47:47 Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> Ah, it explains why my quick attempt to enable BE for MPS2 (M-class
> platform) failed. With this patch applied I'm able to see Linux booting
> on MPS2 FVP model in BE, not complete boot but it might be due to other
> reasons. So this patch definitely improves things for me, if it helps
> 
> Tested-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
> 

Awesome, thanks for testing!

	Arnd