linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 3/3] iommu: dma-iommu: use common implementation also on ARM architecture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2724572.qtPjgumFDJ@wuerfel>
Date:	Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:30:55 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
	Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
	Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] iommu: dma-iommu: use common implementation also on ARM architecture

On Friday 19 February 2016 09:22:44 Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> This patch replaces ARM-specific IOMMU-based DMA-mapping implementation
> with generic IOMMU DMA-mapping code shared with ARM64 architecture. The
> side-effect of this change is a switch from bitmap-based IO address space
> management to tree-based code. There should be no functional changes
> for drivers, which rely on initialization from generic arch_setup_dna_ops()
> interface. Code, which used old arm_iommu_* functions must be updated to
> new interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>

I like the overall idea. However, this interface from the iommu
subsystem into architecture specific code:

> +/*
> + * The DMA API is built upon the notion of "buffer ownership".  A buffer
> + * is either exclusively owned by the CPU (and therefore may be accessed
> + * by it) or exclusively owned by the DMA device.  These helper functions
> + * represent the transitions between these two ownership states.
> + *
> + * Note, however, that on later ARMs, this notion does not work due to
> + * speculative prefetches.  We model our approach on the assumption that
> + * the CPU does do speculative prefetches, which means we clean caches
> + * before transfers and delay cache invalidation until transfer completion.
> + *
> + */
> +extern void __dma_page_cpu_to_dev(struct page *, unsigned long, size_t,
> +				  enum dma_data_direction);
> +extern void __dma_page_dev_to_cpu(struct page *, unsigned long, size_t,
> +				  enum dma_data_direction);
> +
> +static inline void arch_flush_page(struct device *dev, const void *virt,
> +			    phys_addr_t phys)
> +{
> +	dmac_flush_range(virt, virt + PAGE_SIZE);
> +	outer_flush_range(phys, phys + PAGE_SIZE);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void arch_dma_map_area(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
> +				     enum dma_data_direction dir)
> +{
> +	unsigned int offset = phys & ~PAGE_MASK;
> +	__dma_page_cpu_to_dev(phys_to_page(phys & PAGE_MASK), offset, size, dir);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void arch_dma_unmap_area(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
> +				       enum dma_data_direction dir)
> +{
> +	unsigned int offset = phys & ~PAGE_MASK;
> +	__dma_page_dev_to_cpu(phys_to_page(phys & PAGE_MASK), offset, size, dir);
> +}
> +
> +static inline pgprot_t arch_get_dma_pgprot(struct dma_attrs *attrs,
> +					pgprot_t prot, bool coherent)
> +{
> +	if (coherent)
> +		return prot;
> +
> +	prot = dma_get_attr(DMA_ATTR_WRITE_COMBINE, attrs) ?
> +			    pgprot_writecombine(prot) :
> +			    pgprot_dmacoherent(prot);
> +	return prot;
> +}
> +
> +extern void *arch_alloc_from_atomic_pool(size_t size, struct page **ret_page,
> +					 gfp_t flags);
> +extern bool arch_in_atomic_pool(void *start, size_t size);
> +extern int arch_free_from_atomic_pool(void *start, size_t size);
> +
> +

doesn't feel completely right yet. In particular the arch_flush_page()
interface is probably still too specific to ARM/ARM64 and won't work
that way on other architectures.

I think it would be better to do this either more generic, or less generic:

a) leave the iommu_dma_map_ops definition in the architecture specific
   code, but make it call helper functions in the drivers/iommu to do all
   of the really generic parts.

b) clarify that this is only applicable to arch/arm and arch/arm64, and
   unify things further between these two, as they have very similar
   requirements in the CPU architecture.

	Arnd