[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc+xMSiderkF=kZRrerkjzZrZcSCc-LCSNgztk2F896cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:50:45 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
david.vrabel@...rix.com,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, microcode: Remove unnecessary paravirt_enabled check
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:33:46PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> No, the commit 84aba677f009 as of today's linux-next on which I commented.
>
> You commented under the "> A subsequent commit, fbae4ba8c4a3" which confused me
> as to which commit is the culprit.
Yeah, at least now it's clear I suppose.
>> commit 84aba677f009e20185aea322563389ad56e0ef7e
>> Author: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
>> Date: Tue Feb 16 09:43:19 2016 +0100
>>
>> x86/microcode: Remove unnecessary paravirt_enabled check
>>
>> One more thing: I run this kernel as a second from kexec. It might be
>> related as well. For now I have no possibility to run it as a first
>> kernel.
>
> Well, how exactly are you triggering this? Do you have a splat or some
> other register dump so that I can try to pinpoint this. I'll need more
> info so that I can reproduce it here and debug it.
It stuck at some point during boot. I'm trying to get earlycon or
earlyprintk to show me something...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists