[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160219092008.70d55792@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:20:08 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
wanpeng.li@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: add per rq tracking of admitted
bandwidth
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:43:47 +0100
luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it> wrote:
> So, the first attached patch (to be applied over Juri's patch) just
> moves two __dl_sub_ac() and __dl_add_ac() invocations from
> dl_overflow() to deadline.c, using the switched_from_dl() and
> switched_to_dl() methods. This should cover the cases of tasks moving
> from SCHED_{OTHER,RT} to SCHED_DEADLINE and vice-versa. The case in
> which the deadline parameters of a task are changed still needs some
> __dl_* calls in dl_overflow().
Hi Luca,
Please send the patches in a patch series. It is very hard to review
patches that are attachments. And our scripts are made to apply patches
from mailing lists. Having attachments just makes the job harder.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists