[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1602191215140.13632@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:31:02 -0500 (EST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Jon Medhurst <tixy@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: add CONFIG_PHYS_OFFSET default values
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 19 February 2016 11:10:22 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday 18 February 2016 11:02:33 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
> > > >
> > > > Is there a way to provide a default for defaults?
> ...
> > > and then select one of the bool symbols from each platform.
> > > Would that address your question?
> >
> > Yes, but the ugliness factor isn't worth it IMHO.
> >
> > I was wondering if something like this was possible:
> >
> > config PHYS_OFFSET
> > hex "Physical address of main memory" if MMU
> > default DRAM_BASE if !MMU
> > default 0x10000000 if FOO
> > default 0x20000000 if BAR
> > default 0x30000000 if BAZ
> > default 0x00000000
> >
>
> Ah, that was my previous approach, but Russell didn't like
> how it makes it easier to fall back to an incorrect address
> instead of forcing a build error when the address is not
> configured.
Makes sense.
Yet, the only reason for a default here is to accommodate automatic
build tests like randconfig, right?
If so then this should be "fixed" by having the config system provide
built-in symbols that can be tested from kconfig files. This way you
could terminate the above list with:
default 0x00000000 if RANDCONFIG || ALLYESCONFIG
or the like.
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists