linux-kernel - Re: Unhelpful caching decisions, possibly related to active/inactive sizing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160219220701.zjmonn3mj4sgmqcs@alap3.anarazel.de>
Date:	Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:07:01 -0800
From:	Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Unhelpful caching decisions, possibly related to active/inactive
 sizing

Hi Johannes,

On 2016-02-12 15:24:05 -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> I've updated the patch to work with cgroups.

Are tests of this patch, in contrast to the earlier version, necessary?
If so, what's this patch based upon? Because it doesn't seem to apply
cleanly to any tree I know about. Not very hard to resolve conflicts,
mind you, but ...

- Andres