[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1456019356.4031.18.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:49:16 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Simon Quigley <tsimonq2@...ntu.com>, clm@...com
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: backref: Fixed checkpatch warning of over 80
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 18:57 -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Better?
No, not really.
The alignment should be to the open parenthesis
as I wrote in the first reply.
> On 02/20/2016 06:56 PM, Simon Quigley wrote:
> > checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
> >
> > Adjusted to put &extref and &offset on a different line
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Quigley <tsimonq2@...ntu.com>
> > ---
> > fs/btrfs/backref.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
> > index f6dac40..956fffa 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
> > @@ -1830,8 +1830,8 @@ static int iterate_inode_extrefs(u64 inum,
> > struct btrfs_root *fs_root,
> > unsigned long ptr;
> >
> > while (1) {
> > - ret = btrfs_find_one_extref(fs_root, inum, offset,
> > path, &extref,
> > - &offset);
> > + ret = btrfs_find_one_extref(fs_root, inum, offset,
> > path,
> > + &extref,
> > &offset);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > break;
> > if (ret) {
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists