lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:53:42 +0100
From:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] media: pxa_camera: fix the buffer free path

Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de> writes:

>> Okay Guennadi, I retested this version on top of v4.5-rc2, still good to
>> go. There is a minor conflict in the includes since this submission, and I can
>> repost a v6 which solves it.
>
> How did you test it with that patchg #3??
I rebased my patches on top of v4.5-rc2. To be exact, I rebased the tree I had
with these last patches on top of v4.5-rc2. I'll recheck, it's been some time
...

> What's a minor conflict?
A conflict on a context line :
#include <mach/dma.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/media/camera-pxa.h>

I think linux/platform_data/media/camera-pxa.h changed from my last submssion,
hence the conflict.

> If a patch doesn't apply at all or applies with a fuzz, yes, please fix. If
> it's just a few lines off, no need to fix that. But you'll do a v6 anyway, I
> assume.
But of course, let us have a v6 which cleanly applies on v4.5-rc2, and restested
once more. I'll try to have it done this evening.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ