[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56CA204E.3060002@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 20:38:38 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>
Cc: knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wsa@...-dreams.de, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
lucas.demarchi@...el.com, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
ggao@...ensense.com, adi.reus@...il.com, cmo@...exis.com,
mwelling@...e.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: Fix newlines to make code
easier to read
On 18/02/16 15:53, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> This fixes the following checkpatch.pl warnings:
> * WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> * CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary before a close brace '}'
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>
Applied.
> ---
> drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c
> index 0bcfa8d..231a7af 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,6 @@ int inv_mpu_acpi_create_mux_client(struct i2c_client *client)
> st->mux_client = i2c_new_device(st->mux_adapter, &info);
> if (!st->mux_client)
> return -ENODEV;
> -
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -195,6 +194,7 @@ int inv_mpu_acpi_create_mux_client(struct i2c_client *client)
> void inv_mpu_acpi_delete_mux_client(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(dev_get_drvdata(&client->dev));
> +
> if (st->mux_client)
> i2c_unregister_device(st->mux_client);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> index c550ebb..72cc478 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> @@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ static int inv_write_raw_get_fmt(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> +
> static int inv_mpu6050_write_accel_scale(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int val)
> {
> int result, i;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists