Message-ID: <2004800.S71i79juRi@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:18:58 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/1] cpufreq: New governor using utilization data from the scheduler

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Add a new cpufreq scaling governor, called "schedutil", that uses
scheduler-provided CPU utilization information as input for making
its decisions.

Doing that is possible after commit fe7034338ba0 (cpufreq: Add
mechanism for registering utilization update callbacks) that
introduced cpufreq_update_util() called by the scheduler on
utilization changes (from CFS) and RT/DL task status updates.
In particular, CPU frequency scaling decisions may be based on
the the utilization data passed to cpufreq_update_util() by CFS.

The new governor is very simple.  It is almost as simple as it
can be and remain reasonably functional.

The frequency selection formula used by it is essentially the same
as the one used by the "ondemand" governor, although it doesn't use
the additional up_threshold parameter, but instead of computing the
load as the "non-idle CPU time" to "total CPU time" ratio, it takes
the utilization data provided by CFS as input.  More specifically,
it represents "load" as the util/max ratio, where util and max
are the utilization and CPU capacity coming from CFS.

All of the computations are carried out in the utilization update
handlers provided by the new governor.  One of those handlers is
used for cpufreq policies shared between multiple CPUs and the other
one is for policies with one CPU only (and therefore it doesn't need
to use any extra synchronization means).  The only operation carried
out by the new governor's ->gov_dbs_timer callback, sugov_set_freq(),
is a __cpufreq_driver_target() call to trigger a frequency update (to
a value already computed beforehand in one of the utilization update
handlers).  This means that, at least for some cpufreq drivers that
can update CPU frequency by doing simple register writes, it should
be possible to set the frequency in the utilization update handlers
too in which case all of the governor's activity would take place in
the scheduler paths invoking cpufreq_update_util() without the need
to run anything in process context.

Currently, the governor treats all of the RT and DL tasks as
"unknown utilization" and sets the frequency to the allowed
maximum when updated from the RT or DL sched classes.  That
heavy-handed approach should be replaced with something more
specifically targeted at RT and DL tasks.

To some extent it relies on the common governor code in
cpufreq_governor.c and it uses that code in a somewhat unusual
way (different from what the "ondemand" and "conservative"
governors do), so some small and rather unintrusive changes
have to be made in that code and the other governors to support it.

However, after making it possible to set the CPU frequency from
the utilization update handlers, that new governor's interactions
with the common code might be limited to the initialization, cleanup
and handling of sysfs attributes (currently only one attribute,
sampling_rate, is supported in addition to the standard policy
attributes handled by the cpufreq core).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---

This is on top of the linux-next branch of the linux-pm.git tree (that
should be part of the tomorrow's linux-next if all goes well), but it should
also apply on top of the pm-cpufreq-test branch in that tree (which only
contains changes related to cpufreq governors).

---
 drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig                |   15 +
 drivers/cpufreq/Makefile               |    1 
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c |    3 
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c     |   21 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h     |    2 
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c     |    3 
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_schedutil.c    |  249 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ struct dbs_governor {
 	void (*free)(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs);
 	int (*init)(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, bool notify);
 	void (*exit)(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, bool notify);
-	void (*start)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
+	bool (*start)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
 };
 
 static inline struct dbs_governor *dbs_governor_of(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_schedutil.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
+/*
+ * CPUFreq governor based on scheduler-provided CPU utilization data.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+ * Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/percpu-defs.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include "cpufreq_governor.h"
+
+struct sugov_policy {
+	struct policy_dbs_info policy_dbs;
+	unsigned int next_freq;
+	raw_spinlock_t update_lock;  /* For shared policies */
+};
+
+static inline struct sugov_policy *to_sg_policy(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs)
+{
+	return container_of(policy_dbs, struct sugov_policy, policy_dbs);
+}
+
+struct sugov_cpu {
+	struct update_util_data update_util;
+	struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs;
+	/* The fields below are only needed when sharing a policy. */
+	unsigned long util;
+	unsigned long max;
+	u64 last_update;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sugov_cpu, sugov_cpu);
+
+/************************ Governor internals ***********************/
+
+static unsigned int sugov_next_freq(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs,
+				    unsigned long util, unsigned long max,
+				    u64 last_sample_time)
+{
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = policy_dbs->policy;
+	unsigned int min_f = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq;
+	unsigned int max_f = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
+	unsigned int j;
+
+	if (util > max || min_f >= max_f)
+		return max_f;
+
+	for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
+		struct sugov_cpu *j_sg_cpu;
+		unsigned long j_util, j_max;
+
+		if (j == smp_processor_id())
+			continue;
+
+		j_sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, j);
+		/*
+		 * If the CPU was last updated before the previous sampling
+		 * time, we don't take it into account as it probably is idle
+		 * now.
+		 */
+		if (j_sg_cpu->last_update < last_sample_time)
+			continue;
+
+		j_util = j_sg_cpu->util;
+		j_max = j_sg_cpu->max;
+		if (j_util > j_max)
+			return max_f;
+
+		if (j_util * max > j_max * util) {
+			util = j_util;
+			max = j_max;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return min_f + util * (max_f - min_f) / max;
+}
+
+static void sugov_update_commit(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs, u64 time,
+				unsigned int next_freq)
+{
+	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = to_sg_policy(policy_dbs);
+
+	sg_policy->next_freq = next_freq;
+	policy_dbs->last_sample_time = time;
+	policy_dbs->work_in_progress = true;
+	irq_work_queue(&policy_dbs->irq_work);
+}
+
+static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time,
+				unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
+{
+	struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu = container_of(data, struct sugov_cpu, update_util);
+	struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = sg_cpu->policy_dbs;
+	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = to_sg_policy(policy_dbs);
+	unsigned int next_f;
+	u64 delta_ns, lst;
+
+	raw_spin_lock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
+
+	sg_cpu->util = util;
+	sg_cpu->max = max;
+	sg_cpu->last_update = time;
+
+	if (policy_dbs->work_in_progress)
+		goto out;
+
+	/*
+	 * This assumes that dbs_data_handler() will not change sample_delay_ns.
+	 */
+	lst = policy_dbs->last_sample_time;
+	delta_ns = time - lst;
+	if ((s64)delta_ns < policy_dbs->sample_delay_ns)
+		goto out;
+
+	next_f = sugov_next_freq(policy_dbs, util, max, lst);
+
+	sugov_update_commit(policy_dbs, time, next_f);
+
+ out:
+	raw_spin_unlock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
+}
+
+static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time,
+				unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
+{
+	struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu = container_of(data, struct sugov_cpu, update_util);
+	struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = sg_cpu->policy_dbs;
+	unsigned int min_f, max_f, next_f;
+	u64 delta_ns;
+
+	if (policy_dbs->work_in_progress)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * This assumes that dbs_data_handler() will not change sample_delay_ns.
+	 */
+	delta_ns = time - policy_dbs->last_sample_time;
+	if ((s64)delta_ns < policy_dbs->sample_delay_ns)
+		return;
+
+	min_f = policy_dbs->policy->cpuinfo.min_freq;
+	max_f = policy_dbs->policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
+	next_f = util > max || min_f >= max_f ? max_f :
+			min_f + util * (max_f - min_f) / max;
+
+	sugov_update_commit(policy_dbs, time, next_f);
+}
+
+/************************** sysfs interface ************************/
+
+gov_show_one_common(sampling_rate);
+
+gov_attr_rw(sampling_rate);
+
+static struct attribute *sugov_attributes[] = {
+	&sampling_rate.attr,
+	NULL
+};
+
+/********************** dbs_governor interface *********************/
+
+static struct policy_dbs_info *sugov_alloc(void)
+{
+	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy;
+
+	sg_policy = kzalloc(sizeof(*sg_policy), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!sg_policy)
+		return NULL;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&sg_policy->update_lock);
+	return &sg_policy->policy_dbs;
+}
+
+static void sugov_free(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs)
+{
+	kfree(to_sg_policy(policy_dbs));
+}
+
+static bool sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
+	unsigned int cpu;
+
+	gov_update_sample_delay(policy_dbs, policy_dbs->dbs_data->sampling_rate);
+	policy_dbs->last_sample_time = 0;
+
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) {
+		struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, cpu);
+
+		sg_cpu->policy_dbs = policy_dbs;
+		if (policy_dbs->is_shared) {
+			sg_cpu->util = ULONG_MAX;
+			sg_cpu->max = 0;
+			sg_cpu->last_update = 0;
+			sg_cpu->update_util.func = sugov_update_shared;
+		} else {
+			sg_cpu->update_util.func = sugov_update_single;
+		}
+		cpufreq_set_update_util_data(cpu, &sg_cpu->update_util);
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
+static unsigned int sugov_set_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
+	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = to_sg_policy(policy_dbs);
+
+	__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, sg_policy->next_freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_C);
+	return policy_dbs->dbs_data->sampling_rate;
+}
+
+static struct dbs_governor schedutil_gov = {
+	.gov = {
+		.name = "schedutil",
+		.governor = cpufreq_governor_dbs,
+		.max_transition_latency	= TRANSITION_LATENCY_LIMIT,
+		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	},
+	.kobj_type = { .default_attrs = sugov_attributes },
+	.gov_dbs_timer = sugov_set_freq,
+	.alloc = sugov_alloc,
+	.free = sugov_free,
+	.start = sugov_start,
+};
+
+#define CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL	(&schedutil_gov.gov)
+
+static int __init sugov_init(void)
+{
+	return cpufreq_register_governor(CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL);
+}
+
+static void __exit sugov_exit(void)
+{
+	cpufreq_unregister_governor(CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL);
+}
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Utilization-based CPU frequency selection");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+
+module_init(sugov_init);
+module_exit(sugov_exit);
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -299,12 +299,13 @@ static void cs_exit(struct dbs_data *dbs
 	kfree(dbs_data->tuners);
 }
 
-static void cs_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+static bool cs_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	struct cs_policy_dbs_info *dbs_info = to_dbs_info(policy->governor_data);
 
 	dbs_info->down_skip = 0;
 	dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->cur;
+	return true;
 }
 
 static struct dbs_governor cs_dbs_gov = {
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -473,9 +473,11 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dbs_data->policy_dbs_list);
 	mutex_init(&dbs_data->mutex);
 
-	ret = gov->init(dbs_data, !policy->governor->initialized);
-	if (ret)
-		goto free_policy_dbs_info;
+	if (gov->init) {
+		ret = gov->init(dbs_data, !policy->governor->initialized);
+		if (ret)
+			goto free_policy_dbs_info;
+	}
 
 	/* policy latency is in ns. Convert it to us first */
 	latency = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / 1000;
@@ -511,7 +513,10 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct
 
 	if (!have_governor_per_policy())
 		gov->gdbs_data = NULL;
-	gov->exit(dbs_data, !policy->governor->initialized);
+
+	if (gov->exit)
+		gov->exit(dbs_data, !policy->governor->initialized);
+
 	kfree(dbs_data);
 
 free_policy_dbs_info:
@@ -545,7 +550,9 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_exit(struct
 		if (!have_governor_per_policy())
 			gov->gdbs_data = NULL;
 
-		gov->exit(dbs_data, policy->governor->initialized == 1);
+		if (gov->exit)
+			gov->exit(dbs_data, policy->governor->initialized == 1);
+
 		mutex_destroy(&dbs_data->mutex);
 		kfree(dbs_data);
 	} else {
@@ -589,9 +596,9 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct
 			j_cdbs->prev_cpu_nice = kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
 	}
 
-	gov->start(policy);
+	if (gov->start(policy))
+		gov_set_update_util(policy_dbs, sampling_rate);
 
-	gov_set_update_util(policy_dbs, sampling_rate);
 	return 0;
 }
 
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -402,12 +402,13 @@ static void od_exit(struct dbs_data *dbs
 	kfree(dbs_data->tuners);
 }
 
-static void od_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+static bool od_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	struct od_policy_dbs_info *dbs_info = to_dbs_info(policy->governor_data);
 
 	dbs_info->sample_type = OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
 	ondemand_powersave_bias_init(policy);
+	return true;
 }
 
 static struct od_ops od_ops = {
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
@@ -184,6 +184,21 @@ config CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
 
 	  If in doubt, say N.
 
+config CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
+	tristate "'schedutil' cpufreq policy governor"
+	depends on CPU_FREQ
+	select CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON
+	help
+	  The frequency selection formula used by this governor is analogous
+	  to the one used by 'ondemand', but instead of computing CPU load
+	  as the "non-idle CPU time" to "total CPU time" ratio, it uses CPU
+	  utilization data provided by the scheduler as input.
+
+	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
+	  module will be called cpufreq_conservative.
+
+	  If in doubt, say N.
+
 comment "CPU frequency scaling drivers"
 
 config CPUFREQ_DT
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE)	+=
 obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE)	+= cpufreq_userspace.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND)	+= cpufreq_ondemand.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE)	+= cpufreq_conservative.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL)	+= cpufreq_schedutil.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON)		+= cpufreq_governor.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT)		+= cpufreq-dt.o

Powered by blists - more mailing lists