linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/3] zram: use zs_get_huge_class_size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:05:45 +0900
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/3] zram: use zs_get_huge_class_size_watermark()

On (02/22/16 13:54), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
> > well, at the same time zram must not dictate what to do. zram simply spoils
> > zsmalloc; it does not offer guaranteed good compression, and it does not let
> > zsmalloc to do it's job. zram has only excuses to be the way it is.
> > the existing zram->zsmalloc dependency looks worse than zsmalloc->zram to me.
> 
> I don't get it why you think it's zram->zsmalloc dependency.

clearly 'dependency' was simply a wrong word to use, 'enforcement' or 'policy'
are better choices here. but you got my point.

	-ss