linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: dev-replace: fixed comment blocks coding style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1456100856-15604-2-git-send-email-phil@philippeloctaux.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:27:36 +0100
From:	Philippe Loctaux <phil@...lippeloctaux.com>
To:	clm@...com
Cc:	jbacik@...com, dsterba@...e.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Philippe Loctaux <phil@...lippeloctaux.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: dev-replace: fixed comment blocks coding style issues

Makes the comment blocks start with /* on separate lines, and end
with */ on separate lines as well.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Loctaux <phil@...lippeloctaux.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
index b89a8c6..0d817aa 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
@@ -650,8 +650,10 @@ void btrfs_dev_replace_status(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	struct btrfs_device *srcdev;
 
 	btrfs_dev_replace_lock(dev_replace);
-	/* even if !dev_replace_is_valid, the values are good enough for
-	 * the replace_status ioctl */
+	/*
+	 * even if !dev_replace_is_valid, the values are good enough for
+	 * the replace_status ioctl
+	 */
 	args->result = BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_RESULT_NO_ERROR;
 	args->status.replace_state = dev_replace->replace_state;
 	args->status.time_started = dev_replace->time_started;
@@ -870,8 +872,10 @@ void btrfs_dev_replace_lock(struct btrfs_dev_replace *dev_replace)
 	/* the beginning is just an optimization for the typical case */
 	if (atomic_read(&dev_replace->nesting_level) == 0) {
 acquire_lock:
-		/* this is not a nested case where the same thread
-		 * is trying to acqurire the same lock twice */
+		/*
+		 * this is not a nested case where the same thread
+		 * is trying to acqurire the same lock twice
+		 */
 		mutex_lock(&dev_replace->lock);
 		mutex_lock(&dev_replace->lock_management_lock);
 		dev_replace->lock_owner = current->pid;
-- 
2.7.1