[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160222092414.GA24203@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:24:15 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...columbia.edu>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 01:28:29PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>
> between commit:
>
> d5370f754875 ("arm64: prefetch: add alternative pattern for CPUs without a prefetcher")
> 57f4959bad0a ("arm64: kernel: Add support for User Access Override")
> 705441960033 ("arm64: kernel: Don't toggle PAN on systems with UAO")
>
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
>
> d0be74f771d5 ("arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN feature")
>
> from the kvm-arm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
The fix-up looks correct indeed. Thanks.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists