linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND on non-OMAP platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56CADFD5.2040205@ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:15:49 +0200
From:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:	<computersforpeace@...il.com>, <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	<ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>, <javier@...hile0.org>,
	<fcooper@...com>, <nsekhar@...com>,
	<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND
 on non-OMAP platforms

On 20/02/16 00:04, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> [160219 13:27]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> @Tony
>> Patches 15 and 24 are new and will need your review.
>> I've modified patch 22 to include the new am335x boards introduced since v4.4.
>>
>> Patches are based on top of omap-for-v4.6/dt so that the DT changes apply cleanly.
> 
> Looks OK to me. Can we merge the dts changes separately? Otherwise
> we will easily end up with tons of conflicts..

I agree. But we just need to keep in mind that NAND functionality will be
broken till all the patches in this series are merged. We don't maintain
backward compatibility with the old DT implementation.

Do you want me to send you the DT patches separately or you can
pick up patches 18 to 26?

cheers,
-roger