[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160222114524.GA6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:45:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 10/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Store box in
event->pmu_private
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:06:50AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Index: b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
> @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ static int snb_uncore_imc_event_init(str
> return -EINVAL;
>
> event->cpu = box->cpu;
> + event->pmu_private = pmu;
This seems rather pointless, did you want that to be '= box' instead?
>
> event->hw.idx = -1;
> event->hw.last_tag = ~0ULL;
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists