[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1602221258380.2477@nanos>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:58:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 10/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Store box in
event->pmu_private
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:06:50AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Index: b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
> > @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ static int snb_uncore_imc_event_init(str
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > event->cpu = box->cpu;
> > + event->pmu_private = pmu;
>
> This seems rather pointless, did you want that to be '= box' instead?
Duh, yes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists