lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:01:53 -0300
From:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:	shawnguo@...nel.org
Cc:	s.hauer@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, wolfgang.netbal@...matek.at,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] bus: imx-weim: Take the 'status' property value into account 

From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>

Currently we have an incorrect behaviour when multiple devices
are present under the weim node. For example:

&weim {
	...
	status = "okay";
	
	sram@0,0 {
		...
        	status = "okay";
	};

	mram@0,0 {
		...
        	status = "disabled";
    	};
};

In this case only the 'sram' device should be probed and not 'mram'.

However what happens currently is that the status variable is ignored,
causing the 'sram' device to be disabled and 'mram' to be enabled.  

Change the weim_parse_dt() function to use
for_each_available_child_of_node()so that the devices marked with
'status = disabled' are not probed.

Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Wolfgang Netbal <wolfgang.netbal@...matek.at>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
---
 drivers/bus/imx-weim.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c b/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c
index e98d15e..1827fc4 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static int __init weim_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			return ret;
 	}
 
-	for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
+	for_each_available_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
 		if (!child->name)
 			continue;
 
-- 
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ