[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160222120818.GD6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:08:18 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 26/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Convert it to a per
package facility
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:07:02AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return rapl_pmus->pmus[topology_logical_package_id(cpu)];
> +}
> @@ -370,6 +378,7 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct pe
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* must be done before validate_group */
> + pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(event->cpu);
> event->cpu = pmu->cpu;
> event->pmu_private = pmu;
This again looks like pmu_private is 'trivially' replacable with
something like:
static inline struct rapl_pmu *event_to_rapl_pmu(struct perf_event *event)
{
return cpu_to_rapl_pmu(event->cpu);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists