[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160222144954.GE3435@leverpostej>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:49:54 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, punit.agrawal@....com,
arm@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/12] arm-cci: Group writes to counter
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:21:07AM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> Add a helper to group the writes to PMU counter, this will be
> used to delay setting the event period to pmu::pmu_enable()
>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> ---
> Changes since V5:
> - Use the prev_count from event->hw for the counter value, than
> using a single value for all the counters.
> ---
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> index ee47e6b..936fa9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> @@ -771,6 +771,21 @@ static void pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value)
> pmu_write_register(cci_pmu, value, idx, CCI_PMU_CNTR);
> }
>
> +static void __maybe_unused
> +pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct cci_pmu_hw_events *cci_hw = &cci_pmu->hw_events;
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs) {
> + struct perf_event *event = cci_hw->events[i];
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!event))
> + continue;
> + pmu_write_counter(event, (u32)local64_read(&event->hw.prev_count));
> + }
> +}
I think the cast can go here. The truncation will happen implicitly
anyway.
Mark.
> +
> static u64 pmu_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists