lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1456157620-20819-1-git-send-email-jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:13:40 +0100
From:	"Jerome Marchand" <jmarchan@...hat.com>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] assoc_array: don't call compare_object() on a node

In assoc_array_insert_into_terminal_node(), we call the
compare_object() method on all empty slots, even when they're not
leaves, passing a pointer to an unexpected structure to
compare_object(). Currently it causes an out-of-bound read access in
keyring_compare_object detected by KASan. The issue is easily
reproduced with keyutils testsuite.
Only call compare_object() when the slot is a leave.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
---
 lib/assoc_array.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/assoc_array.c b/lib/assoc_array.c
index 03dd576..59fd7c0 100644
--- a/lib/assoc_array.c
+++ b/lib/assoc_array.c
@@ -524,7 +524,9 @@ static bool assoc_array_insert_into_terminal_node(struct assoc_array_edit *edit,
 			free_slot = i;
 			continue;
 		}
-		if (ops->compare_object(assoc_array_ptr_to_leaf(ptr), index_key)) {
+		if (assoc_array_ptr_is_leaf(ptr) &&
+		    ops->compare_object(assoc_array_ptr_to_leaf(ptr),
+					index_key)) {
 			pr_devel("replace in slot %d\n", i);
 			edit->leaf_p = &node->slots[i];
 			edit->dead_leaf = node->slots[i];
-- 
2.5.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ