linux-kernel - [PATCH 02/27] mm, vmscan: Check if cpusets are enabled during direct reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1456235116-32385-3-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Date:	Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:44:51 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH 02/27] mm, vmscan: Check if cpusets are enabled during direct reclaim

Direct reclaim obeys cpusets but misses the cpusets_enabled() check.
The overhead is unlikely to be measurable in the direct reclaim
path which is expensive but there is no harm is doing it.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 86eb21491867..de8d6226e026 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2566,7 +2566,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
 		 * to global LRU.
 		 */
 		if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
-			if (!cpuset_zone_allowed(zone,
+			if (cpusets_enabled() && !cpuset_zone_allowed(zone,
 						 GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_HARDWALL))
 				continue;
 
-- 
2.6.4