[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160223100424.4ebfea45@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:04:24 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Always calculate end of period on
sched_yield()
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:28:22 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Would something like this make sense instead?
It works perfectly.
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Thanks!
-- Steve
>
> It also retains the ->runtime while yielded, and would actually 'fix' a
> case where, when we call yield, we would have had a negative runtime
> after update_curr_dl().
>
> The current code will 'gift' us extra runtime in that case.
>
> ---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists