linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [media] tvp5150: remove signal generator as input from the DT binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56CCA613.2000309@osg.samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:33:55 -0300
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] tvp5150: remove signal generator as input from
 the DT binding

Hi Laurent,

On 02/23/2016 03:28 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Javier,

[snip]

>>>
>>> Shouldn't we revert the patch that introduced connectors support in the DT
>>> bindings in the meantime then, to avoid known to be broken bindings from
>>> hitting mainline in case we can't fix them in time for v4.6 ?
>>
>> Yes, that would be a good idea. I've seen recently though a DT binding doc
>> that was marked as unstable / work in progress and I wonder if that's a new
>> accepted convention for DT binding docs or is just something that slipped
>> through review.
>
> I'm not sure if it's an established practice but I certainly like it. However,
> in this specific case, we know that the bindings are broken, so I think a
> revert would be better.
>

Ok, I'll post a revert then that supersedes this patch.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America