[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHc6FU4FR577X=sZAPUXhCL4SUfrRYTHw9_byehZqwYyBOhQiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:01:20 +0100
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
XFS Developers <xfs@....sgi.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Subject: Re: richacl(7) man page review comments
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher
<agruenba@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> <mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 02/22/2016 03:46 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> I've once more pulled from the latest git; here's some more comments.
>>>
>>> thanks again. I've updated the repo with your changes.
>>
>> Next round :-). Just a few quick comments while I'm on a train ride.
>
> applied, thanks.
I've fixed the following additional problems:
> diff --git a/man/richacl.7 b/man/richacl.7
> index acdff31..1c82644 100644
> --- a/man/richacl.7
> +++ b/man/richacl.7
> @@ -30,10 +30,8 @@
> .SH NAME
> richacl \- Rich Access Control Lists
> .SH DESCRIPTION
> -Rich Access Control Lists (RichACLs) are an extension of the POSIX file
> -permission model (see
> -.BR acl (5))
> -to support
> +Rich Access Control Lists (RichACLs) are an extension of the traditional POSIX
> +file permission model to support
> .URL https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5661.txt "NFSv4 Access Control Lists"
> on local and remote-mounted filesystems.
RichACLs are an extension of the traditional POSIX file permission
model, not of the POSIX ACL model.
Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a man-page covering POSIX File
Access Permissions as in Appendix A of
http://www.bestbits.at/richacl/draft-gruenbacher-nfsv4-acls-in-posix-00.html.
A lot of the gaps between paragraphs were wrong when rendered for printing.
The modification dates were outdated.
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists