lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160223190346.GG13816@cmpxchg.org>
Date:	Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:03:46 -0800
From:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node
 basis

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:57:22AM -0800, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > @@ -2558,16 +2579,12 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
> >  		sc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_HIGHMEM;
> >  
> >  	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
> > -					requested_highidx, sc->nodemask) {
> 
> It's unfortunate that we start with the lowest zone here. For Normal
> allocations, the most common allocations, this will always have two
> full shrink_node() rounds that skip over everything >DMA in the first,
> then over everything >DMA32 in the second, even though all pages on
> the node are valid reclaim candidates for that allocation.

Nevermind, I'm confused about zonelist ordering. It starts with the
highest indexed zones.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ