[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160223193651.GA8491@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:36:51 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/10] dt, numa: Add NUMA dt binding implementation.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:13:17PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>
>
> ADD device tree node parsing for NUMA topology using device
> "numa-node-id" property distance-map.
I still want an adequate explanation why NUMA setup cannot be done with
an unflattened tree. PowerPC manages to do that and should have a
similar init flow being memblock based, so I would expect arm64 can too.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists