linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160224162723.GA4077@test-lenovo>
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:27:23 -0800
From:	Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:43:36AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Small housekeeping request: could you please make sure your series is properly 
> threaded for email clients? This submission was sent as singular patches, without 
> any References header.
> 
> I don't even know how you coaxed git-send-email into doing that - did you use 
> --no-thread?
> 
> The recommended flags are --thread --no-chain-reply-to.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 	Ingo

I will fix it when sending out the next version.
Thanks!

-- Yu-cheng