lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:12:18 +0000 From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> Cc: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>, arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arm@...nel.org, punit.agrawal@....com, mark.rutland@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] arm-cci: PMU driver updates for 4.6 On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:58:14AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 01:55:51PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: > > On 23/02/16 11:40, Will Deacon wrote: > > >On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:49:42AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > > >>Here are some fixes and updates for arm-cci pmu driver targeting v4.6, > > >>applies on top of v4.5-rc5. > > >> > > >>Highlights include : > > >> - Support for CoreLink CCI-550 PMU > > >> - Reliable writes to PMU Counter registers for CCI-500/550. > > >> > > >>All the patches have been Acked. Please let me know how this > > >>can be merged. > > > > >> > > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt | 2 + > > >> drivers/bus/Kconfig | 10 +- > > >> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 612 +++++++++++++++++-------- > > >> 3 files changed, 427 insertions(+), 197 deletions(-) > > > > > >How do you plan to merge this? I can take it all onto a branch for > > >arm-soc, or I can include it on my perf/updates branch, or ...? > > > > Arnd, Olof, > > > > What do you think would be the best route ? > > Traditionally we've been picking these up in arm-soc in our drivers branch. > > Will, unless you want them in your tree for some reason that's what I'll do > here as well. Just that I already have some CPU PMU patches that I planned to send, so I could bundle these in with those if necessary. I have no preference either way though, as long as they get queued someplace. At some point, those drivers should be largely moved from drivers/bus/ to drivers/perf/, but that's a separate issue. Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists