linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] getcpu_cache system call: cache CPU number of running thread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1095889878.7102.1456334277472.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:17:57 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>, Chris Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>, rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] getcpu_cache system call: cache CPU number of
 running thread

----- On Feb 24, 2016, at 6:11 AM, Thomas Gleixner tglx@...utronix.de wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * If parent process has a thread-local ABI, the child inherits. Only applies
>> + * when forking a process, not a thread.
>> + */
>> +void getcpu_cache_fork(struct task_struct *t)
>> +{
>> +	t->cpu_cache = current->cpu_cache;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void getcpu_cache_execve(struct task_struct *t)
>> +{
>> +	t->cpu_cache = NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void getcpu_cache_exit(struct task_struct *t)
>> +{
>> +	t->cpu_cache = NULL;
>> +}
> 
> That's hardly worth a function call. Please inline.
> 
>> +/*
>> + * sys_getcpu_cache - setup getcpu cache for caller thread
>> + */
>> +SYSCALL_DEFINE3(getcpu_cache, int, cmd, int32_t __user * __user *, cpu_cachep,
>> +		int, flags)
>> +{
>> +	if (unlikely(flags))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> New line for readability sake.
> 
>> +	switch (cmd) {
>> +	case GETCPU_CACHE_GET:
> 
> Other than that: Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

Thanks! Will do those changes for v5 and add your Reviewed-by tag.

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com