[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1602242020020.3670@nanos>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:21:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>
cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
kanaka.d.juvva@...el.com, h.peter.anvin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/mbm: Intel Memory B/W Monitoring enumeration
and init
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > You really should register the notifier _AFTER_ registering the pmu. That
> > needs to be fixed anyway, because the existing code leaks the notifier AND
> > memory in case perf_pmu_register fails.
>
> Correct, Will fix the notifier leak
It's not only a notifier leak. The existing code also leaks memory. Please fix
that before adding the new stuff in a seperate patch.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists