lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:47:06 -0800 From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com> To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>, "Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@...eaurora.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: gpio: Really allow an optional clock= DT property Hi Russell, Quoting Russell King - ARM Linux (2016-02-23 03:30:59) > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 07:12:05PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > We mis-merged the original patch from Russell here and so the > > patch went almost all the way, except that we still failed to > > probe when there wasn't a clocks property in the DT node. Allow > > that case by making a negative value from > > of_clk_get_parent_count() into "no parents", like the original > > patch did. > > So you apply it anyway, and ignore all further discussion. I've > no idea what kind of politics is going on here, but it has to stop. Stephen fixed the bug, and I didn't ask you to test because you made it clear that you did not have the time (understandable). Stephen reproduced the issue locally and insured that his version of the fix does actually fix it. He is an equal co-maintainer so of course I support him to merge the fix, plus I find his version more readable. > > I'm also still waiting for that apology from Mike - never apply a No thematics please. When you wrongly accused me of merging code outside of the merge window[0] did I ask for an apology? > modified patch without stating in the commit log that it was modified. > It's basically fraud. An oversight for which we are both equally guilty. The "change" was the resolution of a merge conflict, and I posted the resolved version of the patch to the thread[0]. You said, "Looks fine, thanks." In summary: bugs happen. Let's please just move on and get back to work. [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20160103105319.GB5779@...00.arm.linux.org.uk> Regards, Mike > > -- > RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up > according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists