[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160224220003.GO10126@localhost>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:00:03 -0800
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Lars Persson <lars.persson@...s.com>, arm@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lars Persson <larper@...s.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] arm: Add Artpec-6 SoC
Hej,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 05:20:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2016 17:06:15 Lars Persson wrote:
> > Basic support for the Axis Artpec-6 ARM SoC. Timers, interrupts, UARTs and
> > ethernet are wired up.
> >
> > Changes since v2:
> > - Create a syscon binding for the system controller.
> > - Clock patches split out to new patch series "clk: Add Artpec-6 SoC support".
>
> Looks all good to me now, impressive for v3 on a new platform port!
>
> We'll apply it in the next few days, unless further review comments come in.
Indeed, nice and clean. I have two minor nits:
1) We prefix with ARM:, not arm:. I fixed this up for you. I also added ARM:
dts: artpeg: ... on the dts changes. Not a huge deail on those.
2) Several of the patches lacked description. Subject pretty much says it all,
but it's still nice to have a sentence or two as description. Again, not
a huge deal, and I applied anyway, but for the future think about it.
That being said, I've applied the series across next/soc, next/dt and
next/defconfig. Thanks!
-Olof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists