lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160224033420.868149660@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:34:02 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 111/137] numa: fix /proc/<pid>/numa_maps for hugetlbfs on s390

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit 5c2ff95e41c9290d16556cd02e35b25d81be8fe0 upstream.

When working with hugetlbfs ptes (which are actually pmds) is not valid to
directly use pte functions like pte_present() because the hardware bit
layout of pmds and ptes can be different.  This is the case on s390.
Therefore we have to convert the hugetlbfs ptes first into a valid pte
encoding with huge_ptep_get().

Currently the /proc/<pid>/numa_maps code uses hugetlbfs ptes without
huge_ptep_get().  On s390 this leads to the following two problems:

1) The pte_present() function returns false (instead of true) for
   PROT_NONE hugetlb ptes. Therefore PROT_NONE vmas are missing
   completely in the "numa_maps" output.

2) The pte_dirty() function always returns false for all hugetlb ptes.
   Therefore these pages are reported as "mapped=xxx" instead of
   "dirty=xxx".

Therefore use huge_ptep_get() to correctly convert the hugetlb ptes.

Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -1473,18 +1473,19 @@ static int gather_pte_stats(pmd_t *pmd,
 static int gather_hugetlb_stats(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
 		unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk)
 {
+	pte_t huge_pte = huge_ptep_get(pte);
 	struct numa_maps *md;
 	struct page *page;
 
-	if (!pte_present(*pte))
+	if (!pte_present(huge_pte))
 		return 0;
 
-	page = pte_page(*pte);
+	page = pte_page(huge_pte);
 	if (!page)
 		return 0;
 
 	md = walk->private;
-	gather_stats(page, md, pte_dirty(*pte), 1);
+	gather_stats(page, md, pte_dirty(huge_pte), 1);
 	return 0;
 }
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ