[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160224033354.059382212@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:33:59 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Banman <abanman@....com>,
Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjennings@...iantweb.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 42/54] mm/memory_hotplug.c: check for missing sections in test_pages_in_a_zone()
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrew Banman <abanman@....com>
commit 5f0f2887f4de9508dcf438deab28f1de8070c271 upstream.
test_pages_in_a_zone() does not account for the possibility of missing
sections in the given pfn range. pfn_valid_within always returns 1 when
CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE is not set, allowing invalid pfns from missing
sections to pass the test, leading to a kernel oops.
Wrap an additional pfn loop with PAGES_PER_SECTION granularity to check
for missing sections before proceeding into the zone-check code.
This also prevents a crash from offlining memory devices with missing
sections. Despite this, it may be a good idea to keep the related patch
'[PATCH 3/3] drivers: memory: prohibit offlining of memory blocks with
missing sections' because missing sections in a memory block may lead to
other problems not covered by the scope of this fix.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Banman <abanman@....com>
Acked-by: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@....com>
Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@...iantweb.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1209,23 +1209,30 @@ int is_mem_section_removable(unsigned lo
*/
static int test_pages_in_a_zone(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
{
- unsigned long pfn;
+ unsigned long pfn, sec_end_pfn;
struct zone *zone = NULL;
struct page *page;
int i;
- for (pfn = start_pfn;
+ for (pfn = start_pfn, sec_end_pfn = SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start_pfn);
pfn < end_pfn;
- pfn += MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES) {
- i = 0;
- /* This is just a CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE check.*/
- while ((i < MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES) && !pfn_valid_within(pfn + i))
- i++;
- if (i == MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES)
+ pfn = sec_end_pfn + 1, sec_end_pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
+ /* Make sure the memory section is present first */
+ if (!present_section_nr(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)))
continue;
- page = pfn_to_page(pfn + i);
- if (zone && page_zone(page) != zone)
- return 0;
- zone = page_zone(page);
+ for (; pfn < sec_end_pfn && pfn < end_pfn;
+ pfn += MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES) {
+ i = 0;
+ /* This is just a CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE check.*/
+ while ((i < MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES) &&
+ !pfn_valid_within(pfn + i))
+ i++;
+ if (i == MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES)
+ continue;
+ page = pfn_to_page(pfn + i);
+ if (zone && page_zone(page) != zone)
+ return 0;
+ zone = page_zone(page);
+ }
}
return 1;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists