linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/137] 4.4.3-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1456295365.30631.1.camel@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:29:25 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/137] 4.4.3-stable review

On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 21:00 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:49:45AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 19:32 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.3 release.
> > > There are 137 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Fri Feb 26 03:33:58 UTC 2016.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > 041bd12e Revert "workqueue: make sure delayed work run in local cpu"?
> 
> It's in the list of patches I haven't gotten to yet, which is still over
> 200.  Is it worth adding to this release now or can it wait until the
> next one later in the week?

Sure, no rush.

	-Mike