[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXawteUbi3tzKoo+d8sDx4XAbxz6wROpUrHmb1aXfNffA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:56:02 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: net: memory leak in mkiss_open
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
> unreferenced object 0xffff8800628991d8 (size 4096):
> comm "a.out", pid 7081, jiffies 4294920662 (age 35.917s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 61 78 30 00 00 00 00 00 ........ax0.....
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff86680923>] kmemleak_alloc+0x63/0xa0 mm/kmemleak.c:916
> [< inline >] kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:47
> [< inline >] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:1337
> [< inline >] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2596
> [< inline >] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2604
> [<ffffffff8176b585>] __kmalloc+0x1c5/0x3a0 mm/slub.c:3564
> [< inline >] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:468
> [<ffffffff8554c93e>] kzalloc+0x1e/0x30 include/linux/slab.h:607
> [<ffffffff85551442>] alloc_netdev_mqs+0x82/0xd20 net/core/dev.c:7387
> [<ffffffff83ef39da>] mkiss_open+0xaa/0xc30 drivers/net/hamradio/mkiss.c:707
> [<ffffffff82fbd258>] tty_ldisc_open.isra.2+0x78/0xd0
> drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:454
> [<ffffffff82fbd842>] tty_set_ldisc+0x292/0x8a0 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:561
> [< inline >] tiocsetd drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2655
> [<ffffffff82fa651e>] tty_ioctl+0xb2e/0x2160 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2910
> [< inline >] vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:43
> [<ffffffff8180597c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x18c/0xfb0 fs/ioctl.c:674
> [< inline >] SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:689
> [<ffffffff8180682f>] SyS_ioctl+0x8f/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:680
> [<ffffffff8669ddb6>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:185
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> unreferenced object 0xffff8800652b1aa0 (size 96):
> comm "a.out", pid 7081, jiffies 4294920662 (age 35.917s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> b8 94 89 62 00 88 ff ff b8 94 89 62 00 88 ff ff ...b.......b....
> 98 92 9c aa b0 40 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .....@..........
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff86680923>] kmemleak_alloc+0x63/0xa0 mm/kmemleak.c:916
> [< inline >] kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:47
> [< inline >] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:1337
> [< inline >] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2596
> [< inline >] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2604
> [<ffffffff8176ae6e>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1ee/0x350 mm/slub.c:2621
> [< inline >] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:463
> [<ffffffff8557a4e2>] __hw_addr_create_ex+0x62/0x240
> net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:34
> [<ffffffff8557a7bc>] __hw_addr_add_ex+0xfc/0x270
> net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:80
> [< inline >] __hw_addr_add net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:88
> [<ffffffff8557ac35>] dev_addr_init+0x105/0x1c0 net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:371
> [<ffffffff855514f0>] alloc_netdev_mqs+0x130/0xd20 net/core/dev.c:7400
> [<ffffffff83ef39da>] mkiss_open+0xaa/0xc30 drivers/net/hamradio/mkiss.c:707
> [<ffffffff82fbd258>] tty_ldisc_open.isra.2+0x78/0xd0
> drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:454
> [<ffffffff82fbd842>] tty_set_ldisc+0x292/0x8a0 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:561
> [< inline >] tiocsetd drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2655
> [<ffffffff82fa651e>] tty_ioctl+0xb2e/0x2160 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2910
> [< inline >] vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:43
> [<ffffffff8180597c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x18c/0xfb0 fs/ioctl.c:674
> [< inline >] SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:689
> [<ffffffff8180682f>] SyS_ioctl+0x8f/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:680
> [<ffffffff8669ddb6>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:185
This looks more like a tty layer leak than netdev layer.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists