linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 8/8] livepatch: Detect offset for the ftrace location during build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:23:18 +0100
From:	Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To:	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 8/8] livepatch: Detect offset for the ftrace
	location during build

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:55:35PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> <snip>
> 
> We need to remove the SQUASH_TOC_SAVE_INSNS bits as well, now that the ppc64_profile_stub_insns does not save r2

Sure -- this was meant to _replace_ the changes from patch 2/8, not on top.
And yes, it exposes duplicate definitions, but does not cause them AFAICS.
The two unasked questions about it were: Is Michael's solution on a similar
basis? Is this worth any further effort e.g. put into v9?

	Torsten