[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160224092318.GA24232@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:23:18 +0100
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 8/8] livepatch: Detect offset for the ftrace
location during build
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:55:35PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> <snip>
>
> We need to remove the SQUASH_TOC_SAVE_INSNS bits as well, now that the ppc64_profile_stub_insns does not save r2
Sure -- this was meant to _replace_ the changes from patch 2/8, not on top.
And yes, it exposes duplicate definitions, but does not cause them AFAICS.
The two unasked questions about it were: Is Michael's solution on a similar
basis? Is this worth any further effort e.g. put into v9?
Torsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists