lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160224102149.GS2854@techsingularity.net>
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:21:49 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node
 basis

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:57:22AM -0800, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:04:29PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > @@ -2428,10 +2448,11 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> >  			reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
> >  			scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
> >  
> > +			sc->reclaim_idx = reclaim_idx;
> >  			shrink_zone_memcg(zone, memcg, sc, &lru_pages);
> >  			zone_lru_pages += lru_pages;
> 
> The setting of sc->reclaim_idx is unexpected here. Why not set it in
> the caller and eliminate the reclaim_idx parameter?
> 

Initially because it was easier to develop the patch for but it's good
either way. I updated this patch and handled the conflicts. It's now set
in the callers.

Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ