[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1602241155340.3670@nanos>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:56:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Christopher S. Hall" <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>
cc: richardcochran@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
hpa@...or.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kevin.b.stanton@...el.com,
kevin.j.clarke@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] time: Add history to cross timestamp interface
supporting slower devices
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Christopher S. Hall wrote:
> +{
> + struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
> + bool interp_forward;
> + u64 corr_raw, corr_real;
> + int ret;
Once more:
struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
u64 corr_raw, corr_real;
bool interp_forward;
int ret;
Is way simpler to parse fast.
> {
> struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
> @@ -929,6 +1046,12 @@ int get_device_system_crosststamp(int (*get_time_fn)
> ktime_t base_real;
> s64 nsec_raw;
> s64 nsec_real;
> + cycles_t cycles;
> + cycle_t now;
> + cycle_t interval_start;
> + unsigned int clock_was_set_seq;
> + u8 cs_was_changed_seq;
> + bool do_interp;
Single lines for same types .....
Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists